S.A.F.E. represents an infection control goal that Autumna believes providers of elderly care are achieving and should be able to promote.
Whether its through better training of staff, easily available PPE supplies, or assistive technology and AI that allows regular, faster and more accurate symptom assessment, S.A.F.E. aims to reassure people looking for elderly care, that the service they choose will employ the highest infection, prevention and control policies and procedures.
Firstly, at the moment, only care providers with a premium profile on Autumna can display the S.A.F.E. badge. This situation may well change in the future as the S.A.F.E. accreditation develops and more companies such as QCS (Quality Compliance Systems) partner with Autumna to provide independent 3rd party validation.
If you have a premium profile on Autumna then there are a number of ways that care providers can display the S.A.F.E. badge. They can, for example, upload their individual CQC (Care Quality Commission) Covid-19 Emergency Support Framework report onto the site.
Alternatively, they can provide answers to a checklist of questions Autumna has asked about their infection, prevention and control (IPC) procedures.
S.A.F.E. simply means that the care provider is being transparent about their response to the coronavirus pandemic and about how they manage any infection control in their individual care setting.
It is not mandatory that care providers with a premium profile display the S.A.F.E. badge. It is very much a discretionary decision.
Many care providers though, recognise the importance of using the S.A.F.E. badge to reassure families looking for elderly care. By partnering with QCS (Quality Compliance Systems), Autumna has provided the third-party validation that makes this possible.
Our mission at Autumna has always been to enable families, who are looking for elderly care for their loved ones, to make the right choices. This means the information they need has to be displayed in an easy-to-navigate, easy-to-compare way.
Families looking for elderly care need to be able to filter their searches by the things that matter to them.
Too often, the information that people have needed to make the right choices on later life care, has been hidden, or at the very least, published in a way that has made it difficult to find and to compare.
During the COVID crisis the one question everyone looking for elderly care asked was:
“Are care homes safe?”
In the absence of any definitive published data, and through anecdotal evidence fuelled by negative media reports, the general conclusion they reached was:
“No. Care homes are not safe.”
Through our daily conversations with care providers in the social care sector, Autumna estimated that at least 60% of care homes had not had any residents with the virus, and many more were managing the virus well and were in control of the situation.
We feel that, if confidence in the safety of elderly care services, and care homes in particular, is to be restored, then there has to be some sort of systematic way that a provider of elderly care can counteract a negative publicity story with hard evidence.
As S.A.F.E. develops, Autumna will publish reports on staff training – what qualifications social care workers have received in infection control.
It will detail any new technologies employed by a service that, for example, disinfects or eradicates bacteria. Technologies that allow service users, carers and visitors, to be easily tested for infection symptoms, with results transmitted immediately to relevant monitors.
Going forward we hope that people looking for elderly care on Autumna, will be able to easily find the answer to the question:
“Will this care provider keep my elderly relative safe?”
1.1 Had risks related to infection prevention and control, including in relation to COVID-19, been assessed and managed?
1.2 Were there sufficient quantities of the right equipment to help the provider manage the impact of COVID-19?
1.3 Was the environment suitable to containing an outbreak?
1.4 Were systems clear and accessible to staff, service users and any visitors to the service?
1.5 Were medicines managed effectively?
1.6 Had risk management systems been able to support the assessment of both existing and COVID-19 related risks?
2.1 Were there enough suitable staff to provide safe care and treatment in a dignified and respectful way during the Covid-19 pandemic?
2.2 Were there realistic and workable plans for managing staffing levels if the pandemic leads to shortfalls and emergencies?
3.1 Were people using the service being protected from abuse, neglect and discrimination?
3.2 Had the provider been able to properly manage any safeguarding incidents or concerns during the pandemic?
4.1 Had the provider been able to take action to protect the health, safety and wellbeing of staff?
4.2 Had the provider been able to implement effective systems to monitor and react to the overall quality and safety of care
4.3 Is the provider able to support staff to raise concerns during the pandemic?
4.4 Had care and treatment provided to people being sufficiently recorded during the Covid-19 pandemic?
4.5 Had the provider been able to work effectively with system partners when care and treatment is commissioned, shared or transferred?
Home Care Services
Live-in Care Services
Retirement Living Developments